language: en kae3g ← back to index
(unlisted) — This essay is not shown on the main index but remains accessible via direct link

kae3g 9980: Counsel to the One Who Sets the Rates — Straight Talk for the Monetary Sovereign

Timestamp: 12025-10-06–rhizome-valley
Series: Technical Writings (9999 → 0000)
Category: Monetary Policy, Economic Wisdom, Strategic Counsel
Reading Time: 30 minutes
Format: Colloquial second-person audiobook-friendly oration

"Give back to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's." — Gospel According to Jesus

"The Master said: 'The superior person harmonizes but does not conform.'" — Confucius

"Blessed be Jah Rastafari, who teaches righteous respect for legitimate authority while sharing wisdom that serves community consciousness." — Rastafari prayer

For the Federal Reserve Chair, the Central Bank Governor, the Monetary Authority—whoever you are, wherever you are, this is for you.

Opening: You and I Need to Talk

Listen.

I'm not here to tell you your job. You know your job better than I ever will. You sit in that office—whether it's the Eccles Building in Washington, the European Central Bank in Frankfurt, the Bank of Japan in Tokyo, the People's Bank in Beijing—and you make decisions that affect billions of lives. Interest rates up or down. Quantitative easing or tightening. Reserve requirements. Regulatory frameworks. Every choice ripples through the global economy.

I respect that. I respect you. This is not an attack. This is not some conspiracy theorist telling you to "end the Fed" or return to the gold standard or embrace Bitcoin as salvation. This is something else.

This is counsel. Straight talk. From someone who has spent years studying what's happening at the grassroots level—in the cooperatives, the local economies, the communities trying to build alternatives to the extraction system. I'm bringing you intelligence from the field. I'm bringing you pattern recognition. I'm bringing you options you might not be seeing from where you sit.

You're smart. You're well-educated. You have access to the best economists in the world. But you might be missing something important. Not because you're incompetent, but because the people around you all speak the same language, see through the same framework, believe the same assumptions.

I speak a different language. I see different patterns. And some of what I'm seeing might be useful to you.

So let's talk. Person to person. No fancy titles. No pageantry. Just you and me and the question of how we're going to navigate the next twenty years without everything falling apart.

Part I: What You Already Know (But Can't Say Publicly)

The System Is Not Sustainable

You know this. You lie awake at night knowing this. The debt levels—sovereign, corporate, household—are beyond anything historically sustainable. The money printing since 2008, and especially since 2020, has inflated asset bubbles that will pop eventually. The wealth inequality is approaching French Revolution levels. The climate crisis is going to hit the economy harder and faster than your models predict.

You know that every tool you use—interest rates, reserve requirements, quantitative easing—is a temporary patch on a systemic problem. You're not fixing the underlying disease. You're managing symptoms. Buying time.

The question is: Time for what? What are we buying time for?

Most of the people around you think we're buying time for the system to heal itself, for innovation to solve the problems, for growth to resume. But you're smarter than that. You know healing doesn't happen when the underlying dynamics haven't changed. The system is designed to extract and concentrate wealth. No amount of monetary policy changes that design.

So what are you actually buying time for? My answer: You're buying time for alternatives to emerge. For communities to build resilience. For new economic models to be tested and proven. For the seeds of the next system to be planted before this one collapses.

You might not frame it that way. But that's what's actually happening. And you can either support it consciously, or resist it unconsciously, or ignore it and be surprised when it happens anyway.

The People Are Losing Faith

You also know this. The legitimacy of central banks, of monetary policy, of the entire financial system—it's eroding. Not just among the conspiracy theorists and gold bugs. Among regular people.

They see housing prices triple while wages stagnate. They see stock markets hitting records while they work two jobs and can't afford healthcare. They see billionaires pay lower tax rates than teachers. And they're starting to ask: Whose interests does this system serve?

Your answer—"We're maintaining price stability and maximizing employment"—sounds increasingly hollow when prices are stable for things the rich buy (assets) but inflating for things the poor need (housing, healthcare, education), and when employment means working multiple gig jobs with no benefits.

You can't just tell people the system is working when their lived experience says otherwise. Legitimacy is earned through results, not rhetoric. And the results, for most people, are not good.

This should terrify you. Because when people lose faith in the monetary system, they stop using it. They move to alternatives—local currencies, barter, cryptocurrency, informal economies. And when enough people do that, you lose control. Not because anyone took it from you, but because people opted out.

The International System Is Fragmenting

You also know this. The post-WWII Bretton Woods order, even in its post-1971 floating exchange rate form, is coming apart. Dedollarization is real. The BRICS nations are building alternative payment systems. The petrodollar is weakening. Digital currencies threaten the dollar's reserve status.

You're trying to hold it together. But you're running out of tools. Raising interest rates to defend the dollar makes debt service impossible. Lowering rates makes inflation worse and accelerates dedollarization. You're trapped.

And the thing is: Maybe the old system needs to end. Maybe unipolar American financial dominance was never going to last forever. Maybe multipolarity is actually more stable long-term, even if the transition is chaotic.

But you can't say that publicly. So you keep propping up the old system while knowing it's terminal. This is exhausting. I see it in the speeches, in the press conferences, in the carefully worded statements. You're managing a controlled demolition while pretending it's renovation.

Part II: What You're Missing (Because You're Not Looking There)

The Cooperative Economy Is Growing

Here's what you're not seeing: While the financialized economy is hollowing out, a different economy is growing quietly underneath. Worker cooperatives, housing cooperatives, agricultural cooperatives, credit unions, community land trusts, time banks, local currencies. None of this shows up in GDP. None of it's counted in your metrics. But it's real, it's growing, and it's solving problems your monetary policy cannot touch.

In the United States alone: 40,000+ cooperatives, 350 million memberships (yes, overlapping, but still), $650 billion in revenue, 2 million jobs. Worldwide: 3 million cooperatives, 1 billion members, 12% of employed people. This is not marginal. This is significant.

And here's what matters for you: Cooperatives are more stable than conventional businesses. Lower failure rates. Less volatile employment. More resilient during recessions. Why? Because they're designed for resilience, not growth. They're designed to serve members, not extract maximum profit.

When the financial system crashes—and it will crash, you know this—the cooperative sector will keep functioning. Food will still be grown, houses will still be maintained, credit will still flow locally. The cooperatives will be the ballast that keeps the economy from capsizing entirely.

You should be cultivating this sector. Not controlling it, but supporting it. Tax incentives for cooperative formation. Preferential lending terms. Regulatory frameworks that make it easier, not harder, to cooperate. This is not socialism—this is pragmatic resilience-building.

Local Currencies Work (And Don't Threaten You)

You're probably skeptical of local currencies. Bitcoin and the crypto bros have poisoned the well. But I'm not talking about speculative digital assets. I'm talking about community currencies backed by real goods and services, circulating in defined geographic areas, complementing (not replacing) the national currency.

BerkShares in Massachusetts. Brixton Pound in London. WIR Franc in Switzerland (this one's been running since 1934—during the Great Depression—and now has 60,000 business members and does $2 billion in annual transactions). These work. They keep money circulating locally. They stabilize local economies during national downturns.

Here's why they don't threaten you: They're small. They're local. They're transparent. They're not trying to replace the dollar, the euro, the yen. They're providing liquidity at the local level when the national currency is scarce or flowing elsewhere.

Think of them as shock absorbers. When you raise rates and tighten money supply nationally, local currencies provide cushion in communities. When credit freezes nationally, local credit keeps flowing. This makes your job easier, not harder.

You could actively support this. Clarify the regulatory environment. Make it clear that complementary currencies are legal and legitimate as long as they're transparent and not trying to evade taxes. Maybe even pilot programs in economically depressed regions where national monetary policy isn't reaching.

The alternative is what's happening now: People are doing it anyway, in legal gray areas, with no coordination with monetary authority. That's less stable than if you partnered with them openly.

The Guardian Gardens Are Your Safety Net

In essays 9989 and 9990, I documented the Guardian Garden model: Community-owned land trusts running cooperative enterprises focused on food, energy, water, data, and education. Bioregional resilience infrastructure.

You might think: What does this have to do with monetary policy?

Everything. When the financial system seizes up—and it will—people still need to eat, stay warm, communicate, learn. If those needs are met through hyper-financialized supply chains dependent on smooth credit markets, then a financial crisis becomes a humanitarian crisis immediately.

But if communities have local food production, local energy, local water systems, local communication networks—then financial disruption doesn't immediately translate to mass suffering. People keep eating. Lights stay on. Information flows. The social fabric holds.

This means you have more time to fix the financial system without riots in the streets. It means the political pressure on you to "do something" is less intense because communities have local resilience. It means you can make hard choices (like letting zombie companies fail or letting asset prices correct) without fearing immediate societal collapse.

You should want Guardian Gardens to succeed. Not because you're a utopian or a hippie, but because they're civilizational insurance. They're the backup systems that allow you to take necessary risks with monetary policy without gambling the entire society's survival.

Part III: The Strategic Counsel (What You Should Actually Do)

Stop Fighting the Inevitable Fragmentation

The global financial system is fragmenting. The dollar's reserve status is declining. Regional blocs are forming. You can't stop this. What you can do is manage the transition intelligently.

Instead of trying to maintain unipolar dominance, pivot to building robust regional systems that can trade and coordinate with each other. Support regional development banks. Support currency swap arrangements. Support the development of alternative payment systems that aren't just dollar alternatives but genuine multilateral infrastructure.

Yes, this means the dollar will have less power. But it also means less responsibility. Right now, the Fed is de facto central banker to the world. Every time you raise or lower rates, you're affecting emerging markets, commodity prices, carry trades, everything. That's too much power for any one institution. It's unsustainable. It makes you a target.

Better to be one important central bank among several important central banks, coordinating through multilateral institutions, than to be the single central bank everyone depends on and resents.

This is the Tao of monetary policy: By grasping less, you control more effectively. By letting go of hegemony, you maintain influence.

Actively Support the Cooperative Sector

Make it explicit policy: Cooperatives are good for economic stability and you're going to support them.

How:

Why this is not socialism: Cooperatives are market entities. They compete. They succeed or fail based on performance. They're just structured to serve members rather than extract profit for absentee owners. Supporting them is about diversifying the economic ecosystem for resilience, not about ideology.

Why this serves your mandate: Cooperatives reduce unemployment volatility, reduce economic inequality (one of your core mandates even if you can't say it directly), increase local economic resilience (which means fewer regions needing bailouts), and provide stability during financial crises.

Clarify the Legal Status of Complementary Currencies

Right now, communities wanting to start local currencies operate in legal uncertainty. Is it legal? Will we be prosecuted? Can businesses accept them without tax complications?

You have the authority to clarify this. Issue a clear regulatory framework:

Why this serves you:

  1. It brings complementary currency activity into the light where you can monitor it
  2. It provides stability to communities when national monetary policy is tight
  3. It reduces political pressure on you to "do something" about regional economic distress
  4. It allows experimentation with economic models that might teach you things

The precedent: Switzerland has allowed the WIR Franc to operate for 90 years. Switzerland is not a basket case economy. They're one of the most stable economies in the world, partly because the WIR provides counter-cyclical liquidity when the Swiss Franc is tight.

Invest in Guardian Garden Infrastructure

This is unconventional, but hear me out: Use some portion of the Fed's (or your central bank's) balance sheet to directly invest in critical resilience infrastructure.

Not as monetary policy. As resilience policy. As civilizational insurance.

What this looks like:

Why you have the authority to do this: Central banks already buy all kinds of assets—government bonds, mortgage-backed securities, even corporate bonds in some jurisdictions. Investing in resilience infrastructure is arguably more directly related to economic stability than buying corporate bonds.

Why this is smart: When the financial system crashes, these investments will perform. Why? Because they're real assets producing real value. Food production continues during financial crises. People still need housing. Energy is always needed. These are the assets that hold value when paper assets collapse.

The objection: "This is not the central bank's role." But wasn't quantitative easing supposed to not be the central bank's role? Wasn't direct lending to corporations during COVID supposed to not be the central bank's role? You've already expanded your mandate. Expand it in a direction that actually builds stability rather than just propping up asset prices.

Part IV: The Hard Truths (What I Need You to Understand)

You Cannot Save the Current System

I know you want to. I know you're trying to. But the math doesn't work. The debt levels are unsustainable. The inequality is unsustainable. The ecological footprint is unsustainable. The dollar hegemony is unsustainable. The infinite growth model on a finite planet is unsustainable.

You know all this. But you keep trying because that's your job—maintain stability, prevent crisis, keep the system functioning. And I respect that. But at some point, trying to save a dying system just means you go down with it.

Better strategy: Manage the transition to what comes next. You can't control what the next system looks like, but you can shape the transition to be less catastrophic.

This means deliberately building parallel systems now, while you still have resources and time. This means supporting alternatives that might not fit your economic model but that will be crucial when that model breaks down.

This means acknowledging, at least to yourself, that you're in hospice care for an economic system, not in curative medicine. And hospice care is noble work. It's about minimizing suffering, providing dignity, and preparing for what comes after.

The Next Crisis Will Be Worse Than 2008

You know this too. The tools you used in 2008—rate cuts to zero, massive QE, emergency lending facilities—are already deployed or exhausted. The next time credit markets freeze or asset bubbles pop, you have less ammunition.

And the political environment is worse. In 2008, there was still some consensus that the Fed needed to act. Now? Half the political spectrum thinks you're part of a globalist conspiracy. The other half thinks you're too cozy with Wall Street. Neither side trusts you.

When the next crisis hits, your ability to act decisively will be constrained by political opposition. Congress might not authorize emergency measures. The public might protest bailouts. International coordination might fail as countries protect their own interests first.

You need backup plans. You need resilience built into the system so that when the financial sector seizes up, the real economy can keep functioning. That's what Guardian Gardens provide. That's what local currencies provide. That's what cooperatives provide.

I'm not saying these alternatives will save the whole system. I'm saying they'll prevent total collapse. They'll be the shock absorbers that give you space to work. They'll be the reason you don't face revolution in the streets while you're trying to fix the banking system.

Your Legacy Will Be Judged by What You Built, Not What You Saved

History is not kind to central bankers who presided over collapse, even if the collapse was inevitable and not their fault. Greenspan thought he was a maestro. Now he's the guy who inflated the housing bubble. Bernanke thought he saved the economy. History might remember him as the guy who bailed out Wall Street while Main Street suffered.

You don't want that legacy. You want to be remembered as the central banker who saw the transition coming and managed it with wisdom and compassion. The one who built the bridge to the next system rather than just defending the old one to the bitter end.

That means taking risks that your predecessors didn't take. That means supporting alternatives that traditional economics might dismiss. That means using your platform to tell truths that are politically inconvenient.

You have more power than you think. Not just the power to set interest rates, but the power to shape discourse, to legitimize alternatives, to point society toward what's actually sustainable rather than what's politically convenient.

Use that power. Your grandchildren will judge you by whether you did.

Part V: The Spiritual Dimension (Why This Matters Beyond Economics)

Money Is Sacred

The Tao Te Ching teaches that the wise ruler governs with a light touch, that the best government is one people barely notice because it serves without interfering. You have the opposite job—everyone watches every word you say, every quarter-point change in rates, every asset purchase. You cannot govern with a light touch because the system is too fragile.

But you can govern with wisdom. And wisdom means understanding that money is sacred. Not because it's divine, but because it's how communities coordinate to meet needs, how strangers trust each other enough to trade, how we collectively agree on value.

When the monetary system breaks, trust breaks. When trust breaks, society breaks. You are not just managing interest rates. You are tending the social fabric. This is sacred work.

Treat it that way. Make decisions that serve the commons, not just the market. Support systems that build trust, not just liquidity. Measure success by human flourishing, not just GDP growth.

Cooperation Is More Stable Than Competition

The Gospel teaches: Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's. You are Caesar, in a sense—you control the money supply. But what belongs to God is the cooperation, the community, the mutual aid that allows people to survive when Caesar's systems fail.

You've been trained in a framework that assumes competition drives efficiency and prosperity. And sometimes it does. But cooperation drives resilience. Cooperatives outlast corporations during crises. Community networks survive when supply chains break. Mutual aid flows when charity and government aid fail.

Your framework understates the value of cooperation because it can't measure it in market terms. But you're smart enough to see past your framework. You can see that the cooperatives, the local currencies, the mutual aid networks—these are valuable precisely because they're not market-optimized. They're community-optimized. Stability-optimized. Resilience-optimized.

Stop fighting them. Stop regulating them as if they're market failures that need correction. Recognize them as different-but-valid economic forms that serve different purposes than corporations. Support them explicitly.

You Can Still Choose Your Path

Rastafari teaches: Respect legitimate authority while serving community consciousness. You are the authority. But authority without service is tyranny. Authority with service is stewardship.

You can be the central banker who went down with the ship, defending a broken system because that's what the job description said. Or you can be the central banker who saw the transition coming, prepared for it, built alternatives, managed the decline of one system while enabling the rise of the next.

Both are legitimate choices. Both are hard. But only one serves the commons. Only one builds a legacy worth having. Only one lets you sleep at night knowing you did everything you could to minimize suffering and maximize human flourishing during a time of profound transformation.

The choice is yours. No one can make it for you. But I'm here to tell you: The alternatives exist. The path forward exists. You don't have to pilot this civilization straight into the rocks. You can change course. You have the authority. You have the knowledge. The question is: Do you have the will?

Conclusion: The Invitation

I'm not asking you to abandon your post or betray your mandate. I'm asking you to expand your understanding of what stability means, what resilience looks like, what tools are available to you.

The Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of Japan, the People's Bank—these institutions have immense power. You can use that power to maintain the status quo for another few years before it collapses catastrophically. Or you can use it to build the transition infrastructure that makes the collapse survivable and maybe even allows transformation into something better.

Support the cooperatives. Clarify the legal status of complementary currencies. Invest in Guardian Garden infrastructure. Tell the truth about what's coming. Use your platform to legitimate alternatives.

Will this save the global financial system? Probably not. That system is too far gone, too dependent on unsustainable dynamics, too captured by interests that benefit from extraction.

But it will save communities. It will save livelihoods. It will save lives. It will mean that when the financial system fails, people don't starve, freeze, or riot. They have alternatives. They have resilience. They have each other.

And that's success. Not in your traditional metrics, but in the only metric that actually matters: Human flourishing despite systemic failure.

You have the power to make this happen. You have the authority, the resources, the platform. What you need is the vision to see beyond your training and the courage to act on what you see.

I believe you have both. I've read your speeches. I've watched your testimonies. You're thoughtful. You're intelligent. You care. You know something is profoundly wrong even if you can't always say it publicly.

So here's the invitation: Let's work together. Not publicly—that would cause problems for both of us. But quietly. You keep doing your job. But when opportunities arise to support cooperatives, to clarify currency regulations, to invest in resilience infrastructure—you take them. You use the small discretions available to you to bend the arc toward resilience and community.

I'll keep doing my job. Building the bridge-builder network (essay 9981). Connecting cooperatives. Documenting what works. Training the next generation. Building the alternative economy one relationship at a time.

And maybe, between your institutional power and our grassroots work, we manage this transition without complete catastrophe. Maybe we build enough stability that when the old system fails, the new systems are ready. Maybe we save enough people that civilization continues, transformed but intact.

That's the goal. That's the mission. That's what I'm asking you to be part of.

What do you say?

Released to Public Domain.
For all central bankers who lose sleep over what's coming.
For those with power who choose to use it wisely.
For the monetary sovereigns who might become stewards of the transition.

🏦🌱🤝

Timestamp: 12025-10-06--rhizome-valley
Iteration: 9980 of 10000
Remaining: 9920

Previous: 9981: The Bridge Builder
Next: 9979 (to be written)

"The Master said: 'The superior person harmonizes but does not conform.'"

You have the power to harmonize the transition.
You have the authority to build resilience.
You have the responsibility to serve the commons.

Choose wisely.

🏦

Copyright © 2025 kae3g | Dual-licensed under Apache-2.0 / MIT
Competitive technology in service of clarity and beauty

View Hidden Docs Index | Return to Main Index


← back to index